A new framework for processing student visas based on the risk level of institutions has been formalised by Australia’s Home Affairs Department, in line with the government’s latest migration strategy.
A new framework for processing student visas based on the risk level of institutions has been formalised by Australia’s Home Affairs Department, in line with the government’s latest migration strategy.
Minister for Home Affairs Clare O’Neil signed a directive on December 14, setting out how immigration officials will prioritise visa applications from international students wishing to study in Australia based on provider risk.
It follows the commitment in Australia’s new migration strategy to “apply greater and more targeted scrutiny” to student visa applications from high-risk institutions.
The directive says that “high levels of demand” have created a need to manage student applications “in an orderly fashion”.
Each CRICOS-registered education provider has been allocated an evidence level (1, 2, or 3) and immigration will use this ranking to prioritise applications, with level 1 providers benefitting from faster processing times.
In the migration strategy, the government wrote, “Higher risk providers will experience slower processing times as visa decision makers consider the integrity of a provider, as well as the individual student applicants.”
“Higher risk providers will experience slower processing times”
As promised, the directive has come into effect in December ahead of the upcoming academic year.
Across student visa types, the highest priority has been given to applications from outside of Australia for:
According to the DHA, evidence-level indicators include visa cancellations (due to fraud, “non-genuineness” and breaches of visa conditions, for example), visa refusals, and overstaying a visa.
Student visas are linked to the institution a new arrival initially enrols in.
The government also plans to introduce a new Genuine Student Test, with further details expected in early 2024.
Still looking? Find by category:
Does provider risk mean some colleges and unis not supervied or coached properly? Australia has a great history of providing great higher ed offers? What hapened? I think this needs a careful examination. Rather than punish coach and educate
This is old wine in a new bottle. If level 3 colleges receive less applications and visa conversion is above average then they would move to level 2. It is stats. It is a different issue if some Uni’s are fixed as Level1. And now, most dodgy students would apply in Level 1 Uni’s or colleges and make a mess out of them.