Sign up

Have some pie!

China’s PISA results “not representative”

Education experts have once again questioned the interpretation of China’s PISA results following the release of 2018’s round of data earlier in December.

PISAChina's PISA results have been met with a mixed reaction. Photo: Pixabay

The OECD argues that the results are not intended to represent the whole of China

Just four regions participated in testing in the country – the cities of Beijing and Shanghai and the provinces of Zhejiang and Jiangsu – which when combined, scored significantly higher in some areas than other countries.

“The national ministry has been piloting PISA… in preparation for fuller participation across China”

“These are all [in] the most developed eastern region[s] of China, it’s not representative of the country,” Renmin University education expert Cheng Fangping told The Straits Times.

However, the OECD argues that the results are not intended to represent the whole of China, even though they are often interpreted as such.

When asked why only the wealthiest parts of China were included in the study, A representative from the OECD told The PIE News that over recent cycles, “the national ministry has been piloting PISA in several provinces and municipalities in preparation for fuller participation across China”.

The OECD said that which areas are included is an “individual countries’ decision”.

“As the OECD, we are working on the understanding that countries are working towards national participation, but the OECD has no direct influence over the choice of regions,” the representative added.

China has been participating in PISA since 2009, making it unclear why they have required over a decade to work towards a more representative sample.

This year also marked a change from the previous round of testing, with Guangdong province replaced in favour of Zhejiang.

“The chatter on the internet in China is that Guangdong dragged down China’s performance in the last round because of its poor performance, which may be a result of large population and very unequal development within the province,” Yong Zhao, a professor at Kansas University, told The PIE.

“Zhejiang has a smaller population and perhaps more even development levels and better education.”

China’s education system has both its fans and detractors. It is notable for being intensively competitive, with students expected to spend a large amount of time studying everyday and an emphasis on rote memorisation.

And while many acknowledge the system needs reforming – in part due to fears over students’ mental health and the expenses families must bear for specialised ‘cram schools’ – provinces are reluctant to do so as one province changing its system would put it at a disadvantage compared to other provinces.

Zhao, who has written extensively about the limits of what PISA data can actually demonstrate as well as on the Chinese education system, warned that it should not be treated as a “valid, reliable, and accurate measure of our children’s ability to succeed in the future”.

“I sincerely hope that policymakers and education leaders do not attempt to draw valuable lessons from the results,” he added.

Related articles

Still looking? Find by category:

Add your comment

One Response to China’s PISA results “not representative”

  1. To understand, China has best-practices systems in its developed east, especially in the Su-Zhe area which could roughly be compared to Japan or Italy in its quality of life and culture.

    This best-practices system isn’t universal across China, for instance, what would be the quality of schooling in Tibet or Xinjiang? And not only for the Han population, but for minority populations?

    But the important thing is, China is a centralized state. It can very well perform internal export of its best-practices systems in the BSJZ regions to its less-developed and less affluent provinces. The United States, on the other hand, can’t, because public education is under the control of localities as opposed to the central government.

    So yeah, a realistic China PISA score would probably be middling, around the OECD average overall with lower reading scores due to the complexity of Chinese orthography. But BJSZ is world-beating, even against selections of the best school systems a la Massachusetts and Minnesota in a specific country.

    One day, BJSZ will end up being joined by Guangdong province again. And the overall average won’t drop. And then it’ll be joined by more and more provinces, until you get an entire country whose performance is among the top globally, if not the top, given the performance of the best Chinese systems and their capability to disseminate such throughout other provinces.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Disclaimer: All user contributions posted on this site are those of the user ONLY and NOT those of The PIE Ltd or its associated trademarks, websites and services. The PIE Ltd does not necessarily endorse, support, sanction, encourage, verify or agree with any comments, opinions or statements or other content provided by users.
PIEJOBS

To receive The PIE Weekly with our top stories and insights, and other updates from us, please

SIGN UP HERE