Sign up

Have some pie!

UK sector considers success measure “revamp”

Stakeholders in the UK sector have highlighted the importance of additional, non-traditional measures in assessing the success of higher education institutions.

Issues were raised on how course value has been measured historically. Photo: Unsplash

A good outcome for one student might not be the same for another

Industry experts gathered at the House of Commons in London to discuss ‘Measuring the wrong things? How should we judge the success of universities in creating value?’ in what HEPI Director Nick Hillman referred to as a ‘morning of self reflection’.

Alison Johns, CEO of Advance Higher Education, introduced the ‘fresh debate’, for which the need has grown – amid demand across the sector – on how it captures and measures success beyond traditional measures at the breakfast seminar, which was the first hosted by Advance HE and HEPI since February 2020.

Christopher Hales, interim chief executive and director of policy, UUK, spoke about how the organisation undertook extensive work on answering the debate, publishing a framework of programme reviews to support universities in assessing the value of their own courses.

This sets out principles on the role of using metrics in decision making and recognises “whilst metrics are useful, decisions should be informed by metrics rather than led by them”.

It also recommends that “metrics be used to flag anomalies or concerns which should then be investigated further by considering contextual information reflecting the wider sense of factors,” according to Hales.

Key themes of the framework include student graduate views, student outcomes, graduate prospects, supporting economic growth and social responsibility – a popular phrase throughout the seminar.

Issues were raised on how value has been measured historically, focusing on traditional career paths and somewhat ignoring emerging labour trends; Hales highlighted the importance of “value to the individual being” as something to consider.

We must also focus on how students decide where and what to study and evaluate them as an individual.

“A good outcome for one student might not be the same for another – students will also gain other benefits from studying university that need to be considered but are sometimes harder to quantify, including their knowledge and appreciation of the subject’s competence and friends and connections,” Hales said.

“We must also focus on how students decide where and what to study and evaluate them as an individual”

Susan Lapworth, incoming interim chief executive, Office for Students, said that “continuation of completion are not the only measures of quality“.

“There’s a real risk in basing regulation and funding decisions only on narrow measures,” she added, noting that doing so can fail to recognise the many benefits of education outside of graduate employment.

“We think that students shouldn’t be able to choose courses and draw down student loan funding where outcomes are weak,” said Lapworth.

“These are complex policy questions that we’re going to have to work through collectively to make sure that as the context changes for higher education, the indicators and the measuring that the bridges keeps up to date,” she concluded.

Related articles

Still looking? Find by category:

Add your comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Disclaimer: All user contributions posted on this site are those of the user ONLY and NOT those of The PIE Ltd or its associated trademarks, websites and services. The PIE Ltd does not necessarily endorse, support, sanction, encourage, verify or agree with any comments, opinions or statements or other content provided by users.
PIE Review

The latest issue of the PIE Review is out now! To view now, please

Click here